Difference between revisions of "Talk:Battles From the Ages"
AnarchangeI (talk | contribs) |
AnarchangeI (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
: A few things. I like your setup, and I agree the abilities are too much. We should be encouraging players to see the full deck lists, since those old lists represent work by not only this wiki but that database. However, I think the current gem rows look nice. | : A few things. I like your setup, and I agree the abilities are too much. We should be encouraging players to see the full deck lists, since those old lists represent work by not only this wiki but that database. However, I think the current gem rows look nice. | ||
: Also, Nissa Vital Force, Breaker of Armies and probably a few more do NOT come from events. I suspect they are outtakes, as it were, consigned to the cutting room floor and resurrected here. I think a separate section for those with a different markup would look neater, but as you like. And I don't work here all that much so others should have their say. [[User:AnarchangeI|AnarchangeI]] ([[User talk:AnarchangeI|talk]]) 02:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC) | : Also, Nissa Vital Force, Breaker of Armies and probably a few more do NOT come from events. I suspect they are outtakes, as it were, consigned to the cutting room floor and resurrected here. I think a separate section for those with a different markup would look neater, but as you like. And I don't work here all that much so others should have their say. [[User:AnarchangeI|AnarchangeI]] ([[User talk:AnarchangeI|talk]]) 02:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
| + | :: Eventually the "new" bosses that are only part of this event could have gem rows as well; eg I put the bonuses for Vile Aggregate in invisible notes (and its ability is to give +3/+0 to all it's creatures) [[User:AnarchangeI|AnarchangeI]] ([[User talk:AnarchangeI|talk]]) 02:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:29, 13 July 2022
Node Descriptions
I was thinking that instead of duplicating all the info from the opponents' source events, we could just have a table with some basic info and a link to the original node. To me this would look a lot cleaner and be easier to browse through to find the node you're looking for. (It would replace the separate deck lists section as well.) Something like this, maybe?
| Opponent | Colors | Level | HP | Set | Original Event |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A History Rewritten |  |
110 | 260 |  |
Space-Time Catastrophe |
| Crystal Slipper |   |
80 | 173 |  |
Fables of Eldraine |
| Elder Hydra Catastrophe |  |
140 | 285 |  |
Hero's Path - Face the Hydra |
| Elenda, the Dusk Rose |  |
160 | 360 |  |
Battle of Four Tribes: Part 2 |
| Exquisite Archangel | |
150 | 392 |  |
Revolt against the Consulate |
--MetaBunny (talk) 01:20, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- A few things. I like your setup, and I agree the abilities are too much. We should be encouraging players to see the full deck lists, since those old lists represent work by not only this wiki but that database. However, I think the current gem rows look nice.
- Also, Nissa Vital Force, Breaker of Armies and probably a few more do NOT come from events. I suspect they are outtakes, as it were, consigned to the cutting room floor and resurrected here. I think a separate section for those with a different markup would look neater, but as you like. And I don't work here all that much so others should have their say. AnarchangeI (talk) 02:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Eventually the "new" bosses that are only part of this event could have gem rows as well; eg I put the bonuses for Vile Aggregate in invisible notes (and its ability is to give +3/+0 to all it's creatures) AnarchangeI (talk) 02:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
